triune deity


Is This Phrase proof Enough That Jesus Is A God?

Is This Phrase proof Enough That Jesus Is A God?

Continued from Part 29 Can the Eusebian phraseology, “Go ye, and make disciples of all the nations in my name,” be considered as decisive proof that the clause “baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit” was lacking in the manuscripts available to Eusebius? Perhaps, in writing “in my name” Eusebius was simply abbreviating the longer clause.  What militates against this proposal is that Eusebius cites the shorter version so often that it is difficult to suppose th


Zalman Kravitz

Zalman Kravitz

Proof Or Not About The True Nature of The Trinity

Proof Or Not About The True Nature of The Trinity

Continued from Part 30 The problem with 1 John 5:7-8 It would seem that one of the best New Testament proofs for the Christian doctrine of a triune deity is found in 1 John 5:7-8.  However, this conclusion depends on which translation of the New Testament you are using.  Many modern translations do not include this supposed proof of a trinitarian deity. As rendered in the King James Version of the Bible, it reads:  “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the


Zalman Kravitz

Zalman Kravitz

Explanation of How The Holy Spirit Is A Part of The Trinity

Explanation of How The Holy Spirit Is A Part of The Trinity

Continued from Part 33 Leaving out reference to the holy sprit In the opening salutation of Paul’s letters to various churches (Romans through Thessalonians) he sends personal greetings from “God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.”  If “the Holy Spirit” were an integral and personal part of a triune deity, then why does He not send His personal greetings as well? Obviously, Paul never contemplated that there was such a person.  If there were a third person involved, would not the supposedl


Zalman Kravitz

Zalman Kravitz

Chapter 10b - THE ANGEL OF THE LORD

Chapter 10b - THE ANGEL OF THE LORD

Continued from Chapter 10a Trinitarians cite this passage as further evidence of their allegation that the term “angel of the Lord” refers to part of a triune deity. To them, the text seems to indicate that the angel who appears as a fiery manifestation to Moses is the same being as the God who afterwards speaks to him. However, on further examination, the textual evidence leans in favor of the view that this angel of the Lord functions here solely as a fiery manifestation which attracts Moses’


Zalman Kravitz

Zalman Kravitz

Chapter 22b - Isaiah 52:13: “Behold My Servant”

Chapter 22b - Isaiah 52:13: “Behold My Servant”

Continued from Chapter 22a My servant There are a number of reasons why Jesus cannot be considered the servant. The phrase, “My servant,” presents a problem for the trinitarian doctrine: servant and master are two separate entities. A servant by definition is always in an inferior position to his master. John’s Jesus acknowledges: “A slave is not greater than his master, neither one who is sent greater than the one who sent him” (John 13:16). The sending of Jesus would have taken place while


Zalman Kravitz

Zalman Kravitz