A Single Word Absence In John That Skews The Entire Meaning
Continued from Part 23 The trinitarian argument that the second theos in John 1:1 does not require the article to be considered definite can only be motivated by theological considerations, whereas to translate the word theos as “a god” is consistent not only with John’s use of the Philonic Logos, but with the New Testament’s general explanation of Jesus’ relationship to God. There is no reason to assume that the absence of a definite article is implied or understood. The absence of the artic
Zalman Kravitz